![]() Here is the list of supported server platforms. ![]() Keep in mind that your web server must be running a flavor of Linux – JPEGmini server does not run on Windows servers. The main reason for implementing JPEGmini was to reduce CDN costs, which are only going up each month as we continue to publish more content. All images are handled by an external CDN. Takes a second or two to sync up, but once it happens, the images get served easily to load balancer requests.Īll web server calls get handled by a load balancer, which only serves https web traffic. I have rsync monitoring the “wp-content” folder, so all changes are replicated one way (basically, once images are uploaded to server01, they automatically get picked up by server02). Not an elegant solution, but it works fairly well. Therefore, I have been syncing all uploads via rsync. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to run more than one WordPress server without file upload hassles, as it is not designed to be used in a cluster environment (moving everything to AWS with EC2 running server instances, RDS running the DB and S3 handling the files would be a good solution, but after I tested it out, it was not a cheap solution by any means, especially once you start spawning a few EC2 servers that would handle the back-end load). The two back-end web servers that handle PHP calls from the load balancer is where I installed JPEGmini server, although only the first one really matters, as it is the one that handles all uploads to the site (WordPress cannot handle this directly, so it is only possible to watch for wp-admin calls and direct them to the appropriate server via nginx/apache). First of all, I run CentOS Linux on every server (and there are a few of them). JPEGmini Server Quality and Metadata Settingsīefore I go into the review, I would like to point out a few potentially important bits of information about my web server setup. ![]() JPEGmini Server and WordPress Integration.I decided to publish the review at PL, since I feel that other photography-heavy websites could hugely benefit from implementing the JPEGmini server. Photographers Beware: this is a very technical review of software that is not related to photography. So I embarked on a new project – to save both traffic and money in the long run for PL, using the JPEGmini server. Given how much traffic PL serves worldwide on a day-to-day basis and the fact that images alone account for roughly 5 Terabytes of traffic per month, the thought of being able to compress JPEG images using the JPEGmini engine was something that I really wanted to implement sooner than later. Another use I immediately thought of, was the web server where Photography Life traffic originates from. After I had a chance to test and review the JPEGmini Pro software, I realized how powerful this software is not just for exporting images and being part of a Lightroom workflow, but also for many other uses, including optimizing images that are already sitting on our large storage devices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |